Look at the
Constitution of the United States, 14th Amendment § 4: “The
validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in
suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be
questioned. But neither the United States
nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in
aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for
the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such
debts, obligations, and claims shall be held illegal and void”.
You cannot argue the
validity of Public Debt. Neither the US nor the States are responsible for the
repayment of the debts. Who is left? People! Incurred in aid of insurrection-
that is what the Federal government did. They attacked the constitution by this
very Amendment. Both the 13th & 14th Amendments are
an act of rebellion against the Republic. How can I say such a thing? Did they
in any way, shape, or form, abrogate the requirement for payments to be in gold
or silver coins? If they did not abrogate the requirement is still valid: Abrogate; verb [ with obj. ] repeal or do away with (a law,
right, or formal agreement), within the constitution itself, then all debts
must be paid in silver or gold. How is this not a violation of their oath of
office? If this does violate their oath of office, then it is an act of
treason. They have a right to abolish any government they create when in the
course of human events it becomes necessary to preserve life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness, however, they did not do so. They allowed democracy to
take over and put the guaranteed Republican form of government to sleep. Why a
sleep, it is guaranteed, we have access to it at any time.
The very people that swore an oath to protect and defend the
constitution, are now rebellious, an act of sedition, or insurrection, a coup d'état, and all good people, acting as
they have in the past, flip to being “rebellious” because rebellion is the norm
and the norm is now rebellious. How did they do this? By turning the world
upside down: Section 3. “No person shall be
a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice
President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or
under any State, who, having previously taken an
oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States,
or as a member of any State legislature, or as
an executive or judicial
officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall
have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
comfort to the enemies thereof.” The
Civil War itself was an act of insurrection. We have freedom in this country,
if the people cannot leave to “whenever any Form of Government becomes
destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it”
is an act of slavery itself.
Nowhere, does it state
that the federal government can force any state to remain if they choose to
leave. Southern states walked out of Congress, the United States of America
ceased to exist. War began, illegally, as it takes an act of congress to
declare war and Congress was no more. Democracy was born by an act of
rebellion. All who partook in the act could no longer be apart of the
government, republican form of government, nor the democracy. For the lack of
confusion they added this sentence after, “But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such
disability.”, what house? it was disband. So if all we excommunicated out of
the Republican form of government, who can remove such disability? The people
who they declared cannot hold an office? If you cannot hold an office, you
cannot have two-thirds vote on anything. Funny thing is you cannot even pass
this amendment as they had no authority to do so by this very act. Therefore,
who removes the disability, I believe insurrectionist, AKA congress.
To further, add insult to injury, Section 2. “But when the right to vote at any
election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of
the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial
officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such
State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in
any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion,
or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the
proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole
number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.” This, basically,
states the right to vote for an elected official in any one of the three
branches of government is denied, except for in an act of rebellion. Who now can create all the public debt they want, all
the voters who support insurrectionists are not rebellious by doing what they
have always done, and all the debt is held to be illegal and void.
Why is there is in Section 1, concerning due process of law when that was
established in the 5th amendment? The 5th amendment is
for Americans in the Republican form of Government. Due process in the 14th
amendment is for the Democracy. Thus, Democracy is
born, corporation rules, and the people died: at least on paper. We no longer
are electors, we are voters; we no longer have statesmen, we have candidates.
There is a reason for the change in language, it is a different spell. When
were birth certificates created, in the republic or the democracy? How did God
feel about census, counting HIS people? You can count your people, you cannot
count HIS people. So congratulations, if you support the democracy, you reject
God, you are rebellious, a debtor and if you support the Republican form of
Government, and this was guaranteed in Article 4 § 4, you are an enemy to the
Democracy. Gold and Silver must be use to pay debts in the Republican form of
Government, however, no so in the democracy.
Have you ever
complained that the national debt is too big? Stop your whining! The debt shall
not be questioned. If you cannot see congress balancing the budget, read it,
they do not have to. They are not responsible for repayment of the debts. These
same debts are held illegal and void. People are responsible for the repayment
of the debts and, without gold or silver. Here is the tricky part: how can a
public servant demand masters be responsible of the debts the public servants
create? Answer: They cannot. They just say: “Neither, Mr. Doe or I are
responsible”, “neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay
any debt or obligation” and to appease the “we, the people”, all such
debts, obligations, and claims shall be held illegal and void. How are we,
the people, to repay the debt or obligations of the UNITED STATES? What are
“obligations”? They are held to be illegal and void, until we accept them for
value.
