Marriage License & Race

One day I was visiting my aunt and cousin when her daughter, who was a freshman at the time, showed me her paper on race. As I was reading it, it made sense to me and suddenly I saw the bigger picture of marriage and the marriage license. I decided to capture the flavor of what she wrote and add more of my own knowledge about marriage, coverture, license, common law, and governmental restrictions. While one reads this, this is not about same sex marriage, while a little is mentioned but the main focus is on the old tradition of marriage. At one point I was thinking about self publication and or selling it on eBay, but lack of knowledge only allows me to put it here. Let us begin....

CONCLUSION

The United States, a private for profit Federal Corporation, is bankrupt and has to pay our bills. The SUBSTANCE of the American citizenry, their real property, wealth, assets and productivity that belongs to them, was pledged by the government and placed at risk as the collateral for US debt, credit, and currency for commerce to function. Under the 14th amendment and numerous Supreme Court precedents, as well as in equity, “private property cannot be taken or pledged for public use without just compensation” United States v. Russell, 13 Wall, 623, 627; or due process of law. The United States cannot pledge or risk the property and wealth of its PRIVATE CITIZENS for any government purpose without legally providing them remedy to recover what is due them on their risk. Courts have long ruled that to have one’s property legally held as collateral or surety for a debt, even when one still owns it and still has it, is to DEPRIVE him of it since it is at risk and could be lost for the debt at any time.

“Sureties compelled to pay debts for their Principal have been deemed entitled to reimbursement, even without a contractual promise… And probably there are few doctrines better established…” Pearlman v. Reliance Ins. Co., 371 U.S. 132, 1962.

Those backing the nation’s credit and currency cannot recover what is due them by anything drawn on Federal Reserve notes without expanding their risk and obligation to their own selves. Any recovery payments backed by this currency (FRNs or Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Devices; FRAUDs) would only increase the public debt its citizens are collateral for, which an equitable REMEDY was intended to reduce, and in equity would not satisfy anything, for there was no longer actual money of substance to pay anybody. In other words: there is no actual money in circulation by which debt owed from one party, to another, can actually be repaid. Since 1933, no one has ever really been “paid” because there has been no money of substance. Every time we spend a dollar (IOU), we increase the national debt by that same amount. Every time we send our bills to Treasury for the set off, we reduce the national debt by that same amount.

Federal Reserve Publication “Public Debt, Private Asset” says the national debt is owed to its creditors; which is you and I. We are operating under official Public Policy set forth by the UNITED STATES when they confiscated all the lawful money in circulation in 1933 and it became impossible to pay any debts with publicly sanctioned money under the provision of the United States Constitution, Article One, Section ten, Clause one. In return for the confiscation of the lawful money, the UNITED STATES became liable to pay the debts of the people as fiduciary creditors (agents) of the people. Since all commercial energy in existence comes from the mental and physical powers of the living people, and not from corporations or government, these living people are the lenders or creditors to all of society.

Government cannot have a binding contract on you based on the rule of valuable consideration because everything government has came from you to begin with. Therefore, no adhesion contract that identifies you as a public employee could be binding upon you. They cannot prove they ever loaned us anything, this can be proven with a Validation Of Debt, which they never will, or can, validate, verify or answer to our satisfaction. A copy of the payments you made is NOT validation of a debt “owed”. It does tell you how much to sue them for to get your payments back and add that to the original amount of your credit they borrowed when you took out a car or house “loan.” When they do not answer you by your deadline, you default them and can present copies of those letters to the court, and collect double or triple damages. Publicly judges and politicians will not admit to this because of the chaos they believe will occur, and that we probably would hang them for wasting our lives in meaningless jobs, when they were supposed to be setting off our bills!

The government needed to account for how much commercial energy it owed each, and every one of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. The creation of the SSN accounts allowed the government to take our commercial energy and use it to keep the nation's economy moving forward in the bankruptcy, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. Therefore, the SSN is to track our claims against the UNITED STATES. We are the creditors and they are the debtors. Therefore, we have a pre-paid account with the UNITED STATES since we are the creditors and it is the debtor. The CAFR accounting is the summary results of this accounting of keeping track of the people's contributions and earnings on those contributions and is currently estimated at 60 to 100 trillion dollars.

Accepted for Value applies when a demand is made for payment with implied consideration. If there is no original wet-inked signed contract where both parties offer consideration, then there is no demand possible, only demand w/ implied consideration, which, according to UCC, holds inherent risk to the issuer; if the instrument is accepted as consideration, AND returned for value, THE ISSUER IS LIABLE FOR THE BILL. THAT is where the payment comes from.

In the bankruptcy whoever brings a liability has to bring the remedy. Whoever hands you a bill has to hand you the check to pay it. Write the Accepted for Value verbiage on the statement, write a private issue Money Order on the coupon part of the bill, and send it to Treasury to have it set off. The only way that utility company was built is that they mortgaged (borrowed against) our property and future labor compensation so everything since 1933 is Pre-Paid. A true contract has “consideration” from both parties. Consideration occurs when the bank, credit card company, whoever, has actually offered you something and you offered to pay them back”. Of course, we know the banks, credit card companies, whoever, do NOT actually loan us anything! They use our signature to get funds (our own credit) from Treasury.

To deny AFV, is to claim sins will not be forgiven, by God (In earth, as it is in Heaven, what you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven). Given in Love to the Children of God: my brothers, and sisters. Knock and the door will open, seek and you will find, and ask and it will be given. Remember, If you have faith, without doubting, not only may you do what has been done, but even if you say to this mountain, Be taken up and put into the sea, it will be done. Matthew 21:21.

Agree with thine adversary quickly, while thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. Verily I say unto thee, Thou shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing. Matthew 5:25-26

Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. How was that determined? The coin, whose face is on it? The dead are on our FRN’s. The dead use it, the dead accept it, the dead create it. Whose name is on the FRN’s? FEDERAL RESERVE, thus if the IRS, acting in behalf of the Federal Reserve System demands “funds”, Give it to them! Accept the demand, request, or the pleading. Be in Honor with their laws, codes, statutes- appease the beast with feet of clay: do not argue with the Anti-Christ- AFV it.

You can accept or reject AFV and you will be right. Why? I cannot prove the world is round until your willing to accept the idea that it might be and willing to understand. If you reject the idea, who am I to say you are wrong? I will not dishonor your beliefs. I have given you facts and information that you can check out, correct me if or where I am wrong, or ignore it. Do words have meaning? Do words have value? If words mean nothing, then anything goes. If words mean something, what is it?

You decide, if “Accepted For Value” or “Accept for Value” is a valid process? Is the “Federal Reserve Note” (FRN) real money? Are the Federal Reserve System and the democracy considered false-coiners? If you say no, you are right, after all, why would I argue with you? You are creator of fictions. A fiction is a non-truth, which could be a lie if it were to deceive you. If you believe it was designed to deceive, then consider, who is the father of lies? I would then have to say, I see it differently. If you put God first, then all these things will be added to you.

God can touch Man, and Man can reach out to God. Man can never touch a corporation, nor can any corporation reach out to Man; it is an artificial entity, a fiction, a name we call a thing, soulless, lifeless, emotionless, and thoughtless. It needs actors and puppeteers, it is only business. The art of business is to benefit man, a vehicle to help others in a group setting. Man needs to give, to live. Corporations only express their masters desires. May they be deserving desires, it all depends on their masters.

In the name of the King, of the Kingdom of Heaven, it is done.

SINFUL

Accept For Vale has its roots as old as man. How did one use to settle sins? They used goats, by placing their hands upon the animal and passed their debts onto, or into the goat, and set it free, or slit its throat. By our acceptance, and by our hand we charge the vehicle to settle our debts. Is this not what we do for the “Accept for Value”, as an allege Christian? How have people claimed to have healed the sick, pass on blessings, pass on sins, give first born rights, perform marriages, pray, cast spells, build, farm or many other things, it is all done by hand(s). Hands are a source of passion, strength, creation, and spirituality. It is by our own hands that we give value, accept gifts, present gifts: hands have power. There is the doctrine of clean hands, or doctrine of unclean hands. We greet, hug, fight, salute, talk, and a lot more, by our hands, it is our energy.

UCC § 4-213:

(a) With respect to settlement by a bank, the medium and time of settlement may be prescribed by Federal Reserve regulations or circulars, clearing-house rules, and the like, or agreement. In the absence of such prescription:

(1) the medium of settlement is cash or credit to an account in a Federal Reserve bank of or specified by the person to receive settlement; and

(2) the time of settlement, is: (ii) with respect to tender of settlement by credit in an account in a Federal Reserve Bank, when the credit is made;

(d) If settlement for an item is made by giving authority to charge the account of the bank giving settlement in the bank receiving settlement, settlement is final when the charge is made by the bank receiving settlement if there are funds available in the account for the amount of the item.

It is not by payment, it is by settlement, funds are released or converted.  The recovery remedy is maintained in law because it has to be to satisfy equity to its prime creditors. Nevertheless, at this late time, the United States is neither expecting nor intending it to be generally accessed by those in responsibility will not deny or dishonor it, or an instrument of discharge properly submitted for that purpose. (No agency has ever returned my “Accepted for Value” presentments back to me as “refused”.)

TENDER

UCC § 3-302(a): “Subject to subsection (c) and Section 3-106(d), “holder in due course” means the holder of an instrument.”

UCC § 4-211: “For purposes of determining its status as a holder in due course, a bank has given value to the extent it has a security interest in an item, if the bank otherwise complies with the requirements of Section 3-302 on what constitutes a holder in due course”. (We are banks).

UCC § 3-203(c): “Unless otherwise agreed, if an instrument is transferred for value and the transferee does not become a holder because of lack of indorsement by the transferor, the transferee has a specifically enforceable right to the unqualified indorsement of the transferor, but negotiation of the instrument does not occur until the indorsement is made”.

UCC§ 4-210:

(a) A collecting bank has a security interest in an item and any accompanying documents or the proceeds of either:

(2) in case of an item for which it has given credit available for withdrawal as of right, to the extent of the credit given, whether or not the credit is drawn upon or there is a right of charge-back…

(c) Receipt by a collecting bank of a final settlement for an item is a realization on its security interest in the item, accompanying documents, and proceeds. So long as the bank does not receive final settlement for the item or give up possession of the item or possession or control of the accompanying documents for purposes other than collection, the security interest continues to that extent and is subject to Article 9 (Secured Transactions)…

UCC § 3-303:

(a) An instrument is issued or transferred for value if:

(1) the instrument is issued or transferred for a promise of performance, to the extent the promise has been performed;

(3) the instrument is issued or transferred as payment of, or as security for, an antecedent claim against any person, whether or not the claim is due;

(4) the instrument is issued or transferred in exchange for a negotiable instrument; or

(5) the instrument is issued or transferred in exchange for the incurring of an irrevocable obligation to a third party by the person taking the instrument.

(b)  “Consideration” means any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract. The drawer or maker of an instrument has a defense if the instrument is issued without consideration. If an instrument is issued for a promise of performance, the issuer has a defense to the extent performance of the promise is due and the promise has not been performed. If an instrument is issued for value as stated in subsection (a), the instrument is also issued for consideration.

TITLE 12 § 371b–2 (c) (1) For purposes of subsection (b) of this section, an insured depository institution’s “exposure” to another depository institution means—

(A) all extensions of credit to the other depository institution, regardless of name or description, including—

(i) all deposits at the other depository institution;

(ii) all purchases of securities or other assets from the other depository institution subject to an agreement to repurchase; and

(iii) all guarantees, acceptances, or letters of credit (including endorsements or standby letters of credit) on behalf of the other depository institution;

(B) all purchases of or investments in securities issued by the other depository institution;

(C) all securities issued by the other depository institution accepted as collateral for an extension of credit to any person; and

(D) all similar transactions that the Board by regulation determines to be exposure for purposes of this section.

UCC § 3-603. Tender Of Payment.

(a) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract.

(b) If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of the obligation of an indorser or accommodation party having a right of recourse with respect to the obligation to which the tender relates.

(c) If tender of payment of an amount due on an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the obligation of the obligor to pay interest after the due date on the amount tendered is discharged. If presentment is required with respect to an instrument and the obligor is able and ready to pay on the due date at every place of payment stated in the instrument, the obligor is deemed to have made tender of payment on the due date to the person entitled to enforce the instrument.

AS OLD AS TIME

We now know that there are laws that allow us to do this “Accepted For Value” or “Accept for Value”, as wealth, mammon, is made up, which means poverty is a lie. Is there a biblical reference to this Acceptance and discharge? It is all over the bible, as for Christians, it is the foundation of its existence, and the crucifixion: “Luke 23:32 And two others, evil-doers, were taken with him to be put to death. 33 And when they came to the place which is named Golgotha, they put him on the cross, and the evil-doers, one on the right side, and the other on the left. Luke 23:39-43 And one of the evil-doers on the cross, with bitter feeling, said to him, Are you not the Christ? Get yourself and us out of this. But the other, protesting, said, Have you no fear of God? for you have a part in the same punishment, And with reason; for we have the right reward of our acts, but this man has done nothing wrong. And he said, Jesus, keep me in mind when you come in your kingdom. And he said to him, Truly I say to you, Today you will be with me in Paradise.” Was this man baptized? No indication that he was. Also note they specially mention the left and right. Where in our glorious accounting system do we put debts? Debts go on the left side and the credits go on the right. In the middle is the cross of accounting, or zero point. What did this man do? He “accepted for value” his punishment and he was granted paradise. His debts / sins were forgiven. Ever since the garden, be it fantasy, fiction or reality, it tells of the value of not accepting your debts (actions). “Genesis 2: 9-14 And the voice of the Lord God came to the man, saying, Where are you? And he said, Hearing your voice in the garden I was full of fear, because I was without clothing: and I kept myself from your eyes. And he said, Who gave you the knowledge that you were without clothing? Have you taken of the fruit of the tree which I said you were not to take? And the man said, The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me the fruit of the tree and I took it. And the Lord God said to the woman, What have you done? And the woman said, I was tricked by the deceit of the snake and I took it. And the Lord God said to the snake, Because you have done this you are cursed more than all cattle and every beast of the field; you will go flat on the earth, and dust will be your food all the days of your life” Did these two accept their actions? No. They decided to hide. One cannot be forgiven, if one does not admit or accept. As if God did not know what happen? Did God argue? Debate? Discuss? Challenge? On the other hand, did God accept their answers and punish whom they blamed? God in fact did unto Adam and Eve as he would have wanted done to him, and that is accept the words as spoken, even if it were a lie. The snake was never asked why he did it, never given the opportunity to blame anyone or make up a story, never had the opportunity to seek forgiveness. What would have happen had Adam said, “It is my fault for my/our actions, please forgive me”? Nevertheless, we spend our life judging and blaming others for our actions. The fruit of Tree of Knowledge of Good and evil is all about judgment. The fruit is symbolic for you reap what you sow. The fruit of the actions, results. Knowledge is experience. Good and evil is judgment. This earthly reality, is the result of experiencing judgment; paradise lost, it is hell.

When God killed King David’s son it was due to David’s own decree. He had committed adultery and murder to get Bath-Sheba. David accepted for value his sins. Christ is often referred to, as the son of David, for a son will be the price for the sins of others. In addition, if we go further into the bible, does it not say “Agree with thine adversary quickly Matthew 5:25”, “Matthew 5:40 and if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloche also”. Know that when you disagree with another, you call him a liar or at least dishonor, this is why it is important to countersue, rather then being a defendant, for a defendant position is to claim the other has lied and if you cannot prove it, you become the liar, you would be in dishonor. If I say this is black and another says this is white, one is lying. They may in fact view it differently then I, but this is not the claim: I see this as being white. Whom am I to say what he understands is incorrect. Stop pointing fingers and accept for value the way they see it. It does not mean it is true, it only means this is what they believe. Does government lie? It is a fiction, what else can fictions do but create fictions. A fiction is a lie. There are also other principals as well, “do unto others as you have them do unto you, judge not least you be judged, turn the other cheek, forgive and ye will be forgiven”. Do these conflict with the idea of accept for value? Are they not in line with “Accepted For Value” or “Accept for Value”? Love your neighbor as thyself, Love God with all your heart, mind, body and sprit: how can you love, if you are calling them a liar, or fighting with them.

COMMERCE

Concerning commerce and the exchange of goods by the LON Book 1 Chapter X § 109: “Of exchange, and the laws of commerce: There is another custom more modern, and of no less use to commerce than the establishment of coin, namely exchange, or the traffic of bankers, by means of which a merchant remits immense sums from one end of the world to the other, at a very trifling expense, and, if he pleases, without risk. For the same reason that sovereigns are obliged to protect commerce, they are obliged to support this custom, by good laws, in which every merchant, whether citizen or foreigner, may find security. In general, it is equally the interest and the duty of every nation to have wise and equitable commercial laws established in the country.

(49) The modern law of nations, and the municipal law of England, as to coin, bullion, and money, will be found collected in 1 Bla. Com 276 to 280; 4 Id. 84 to 120; 1 Chitty's Commercial Law, 583; 2 Id. 179 to 187, and statutes and decisions there collected. — C.

1. In Boizard’s Treatise on Coin, we find the following observations: “It is worthy of remark, that, when our kings debased the coin, they kept the circumstance a secret from the people: — witness the ordinance of Philip de Valois in 1350, by which he ordered Tournois Doubles to be coined 2d 5 1/3 gr. fine, which was, in fact, a debasement of the coin. In that ordinance, addressing the officers of the mint, he says — Upon the oath by which you are bound to the king, keep this affair as secret as you possibly can, that neither the bankers nor others may, by your means, acquire any knowledge of it; for if, through you, it comes to be known, you shall be punished for the offence in such manner as shall serve as an example to others.” — The same author quotes other similar ordinances of the same king, and one issued by the Dauphin, who governed the kingdom as regent during the captivity of King John, dated June 27, 1360, by virtue of which the mint-masters, directing the officers engaged in the coinage to coin white Deniers 1d. 12 gr. fine, at the same time expressly command them to keep this order secret, and, “if any persons should make inquiry respecting their standard, to maintain that they were 2d. fine.” Chap. xxix.

The kings [of France] had recourse to this strange expedient in cases of urgent necessity; but they saw its injustice. — The same author, speaking of the debasement of coin, or the various modes of reducing its intrinsic value, says — “These expedients are but rarely resorted to, because they give occasion to the exportation or melting down of the good specie, and to the introduction and circulation of foreign coin — raise the price of every thing — impoverish individuals — diminish the revenue, which is paid in specie of inferior value — and sometimes put a total stop to commerce. This truth has been so well understood in all ages, that those princes who had recourse to one or other of these modes of debasing the coin in difficult times, ceased to practice it the moment the necessity ceased to exist.” We have, on this subject, an ordinance of Philip the Fair, issued in May, 1295, which announces, that, “The king having reduced the coin both in fineness and weight, and expecting to be obliged to make a further reduction in order to retrieve his affairs, — but knowing himself to be, in conscience, responsible for the injury caused to the state by such reduction, — pledges himself to the people of his kingdom, by solemn charter, that, as soon as his affairs are retrieved, he will restore the coin to its proper standard and value, at his own private cost and expense, and will himself bear all the loss and waste. And, in addition to this engagement, Dame Joan, Queen of France and Navarre, pledges her revenues and dower for the same purpose.” Note. edit A.D. 1797.

2. In his Republic, book i, chap. x. (50) This is a sound principle, which ought to be extended so as to deny effect to any fraud upon a foreign nation or its subjects. But in England, a narrow and immoral policy prevails of not noticing frauds upon the revenue of a foreign state. Roach v. Edie, 6 Term Rep. 425; Boucher v. Lawrence, R.T. Hardw. 198; Holman v. Johnson, Cowp. 343; James v, Catherwood, 3 Dowl. & Ryl. 190, {Cambiooso's Ex. v. Maffet's Assignees, 2 Wash, C.C. Rep. 99.} And so far has this narrow doctrine been carried, in disgrace of this country, that, in Smith v. Marconnay, 2 Peake's Rep. 81, it was held, that the maker of paper in England, knowingly made by him for the purpose of forging assignats upon the same, to be exported to France in order to commit frauds there on other persons, might recover damages for not accepting such paper pursuant to contract. So a master of an English ship was even allowed to recover salvage for bringing home his captured vessel, by deceptively inducing the enemy to release the vessel on his giving a ransom bill, payment of which he look care to countermand in London. 2 Dodson's R. 74”.

So restated; According to: LON Book 1 Chapter X § 106: as referenced in, Article 1 § 8 ¶ 5, of the constitution for the United States of America. “Money is fabricated or invented by the power or right to control and in behalf of, on the part of, by authority of the state or any sovereign(s), who are its surety...” Therefore, Money is meaningless, as it is made up; gold and silver only have value because we have declared it has value. Whatever we give value to, has value, at least to us, “Accepted For Value” or “Accept for Value”. Congress is to punish those that have committed offenses against the Law of Nations, Article 1 § 8 ¶ 10, notice how this section also includes High Seas crimes, control of vessels, and US CITIZENS are vessels.

Matthew 9-15 Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen. For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses. Will we use gold to buy things when in Heaven? Using money is in violation of God’s will. Yet using money is what we do to survive on earth, at lease until the men of the governments in the earth (the dead, of which corporations are) decide they too want to follow God. Money does not make us good nor evil, it only is a magnifier as to who we already are. When we have money for the sake of money or in fear of scarcity, then Money Rules. When we have money for how we can use it to help others, then we are doing "good" towards our fellow man. Money does nothing but demonstrates our talents. How much Talent do you have? Can we barter? Trade? Exchange items? Can we do this all on paper?

GIVE PERMISSION

When we create the AFV and the money order, we are giving them permission for the Treasury department to place our creation, i.e. AFV & MO, under the rules of foreign coin, weights and measures, as established by congress, Article 1, § 8: “To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures”. Our creations are foreign to the Government and even more so to the democracy; but it also foreign to everyone else, as theirs is to everyone of us non-government employees. Therefore, once we accepted the presentment/statement/bill for value, they are to release the funds. Their scripture allows for this as well. Consider that funds are not money, may not even be FRNs, or even circulating notes. Funds are define as “a sum of money saved or made available for a particular purpose, financial resources, a large stock or supply of something, or an organization set up for the administration and management of a monetary fund”. UCC § 3-602: “(a) Subject to subsection (b), an instrument is paid to the extent payment is made (i) by or on behalf of a party obliged to pay the instrument, and (ii) to a person entitled to enforce the instrument. To the extent of the payment, the obligation of the party obliged to pay the instrument is discharged even though payment is made with knowledge of a claim to the instrument under Section 3-306 by another person.”

The Treasury has an obligation (Public Trust) as a department of government serving the public (people) interest to the bank which as a member of the Federal Reserve System that has a commercial obligation to an account holder and a 3rd party who tendered the item in payment to tell them that its not any good or its not going to be honored, even if they wanted to keep it for prosecution or investigation. This is in effect what the directive says the government will do if its no good.

Public: •  of or concerning the people as a whole: • open to or shared by all the people of an area or country: • ordinary people in general; the community: in public in view of other people: • ORIGIN late Middle English: from Old French, from Latin publicus, blend of poplicus ‘of the people’ (from populus ‘people’) and pubes ‘adult.’

They do not dishonor it in any way by return of the item or the sending of any notice to that effect, or make request for additional information or time for examination of the instrument, or given a statement of explanation indicating the time frame for its review and settlement if it would be an inordinately lengthy time as longer than 60 days to finish with it. The instruments are being kept, held, and without return or dishonor, are accepted as an obligation of the United States in the discharge and recovery of the public debt as it makes claim on its face to be.

Put another way: If the bank had had to pay the item to honor its customer agreement as if it had been a check, what would or could the bank be trying to do with it to finally settle the account? The bank needs to treat the Instrument tendered as an obligation of the United States to the bank. The tender of these Instruments discharge the obligation of the debt for which they are delivered and the payee becomes the new holder in due course and collection agent on the Instruments.

Title 31 § 3335: Timely disbursement of Federal funds

(a) Each head of an executive agency (other than the Tennessee Valley Authority) shall, under such regulations as the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe, provide for the timely disbursement of Federal funds through cash, checks, electronic funds transfer, or any other means identified by the Secretary.

(b) The Secretary may collect from any executive agency which does not comply with subsection (a) a charge in an amount the Secretary determines to be the cost to the general fund of the Treasury caused by such noncompliance.

(c) The amounts of charges collected from an executive agency under this section shall be deposited in the Treasury and credited as miscellaneous receipts.

(d) Any charge assessed by the Secretary under this section, to the maximum extent practicable—

(1) shall be paid out of appropriations available for executive agency operations; and

(2) shall not be paid from amounts available for funding programs of an executive agency.