FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT

Look at the Constitution of the United States, 14^th Amendment § 4: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations, and claims shall be held illegal and void”.

You cannot argue the validity of Public Debt. Neither the US nor the States are responsible for the repayment of the debts. Who is left? People! Incurred in aid of insurrection- that is what the Federal government did. They attacked the constitution by this very Amendment. Both the 13^th & 14^th Amendments are an act of rebellion against the Republic. How can I say such a thing? Did they in any way, shape, or form, abrogate the requirement for payments to be in gold or silver coins? If they did not abrogate the requirement is still valid: Abrogate; verb [ with obj. ] repeal or do away with (a law, right, or formal agreement), within the constitution itself, then all debts must be paid in silver or gold. How is this not a violation of their oath of office? If this does violate their oath of office, then it is an act of treason. They have a right to abolish any government they create when in the course of human events it becomes necessary to preserve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, however, they did not do so. They allowed democracy to take over and put the guaranteed Republican form of government to sleep. Why a sleep, it is guaranteed, we have access to it at any time.

The very people that swore an oath to protect and defend the constitution, are now rebellious, an act of sedition, or insurrection, a coup d'état, and all good people, acting as they have in the past, flip to being “rebellious” because rebellion is the norm and the norm is now rebellious. How did they do this? By turning the world upside down:  Section 3. “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”  The Civil War itself was an act of insurrection. We have freedom in this country, if the people cannot leave to “whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it” is an act of slavery itself.

Nowhere, does it state that the federal government can force any state to remain if they choose to leave. Southern states walked out of Congress, the United States of America ceased to exist. War began, illegally, as it takes an act of congress to declare war and Congress was no more. Democracy was born by an act of rebellion. All who partook in the act could no longer be apart of the government, republican form of government, nor the democracy. For the lack of confusion they added this sentence after, “But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”, what house? it was disband. So if all we excommunicated out of the Republican form of government, who can remove such disability? The people who they declared cannot hold an office? If you cannot hold an office, you cannot have two-thirds vote on anything. Funny thing is you cannot even pass this amendment as they had no authority to do so by this very act. Therefore, who removes the disability, I believe insurrectionist, AKA congress.

To further, add insult to injury, Section 2. “But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.” This, basically, states the right to vote for an elected official in any one of the three branches of government is denied, except for in an act of rebellion. Who now can create all the public debt they want, all the voters who support insurrectionists are not rebellious by doing what they have always done, and all the debt is held to be illegal and void.

Why is there is in Section 1, concerning due process of law when that was established in the 5^th amendment? The 5^th amendment is for Americans in the Republican form of Government. Due process in the 14^th amendment is for the Democracy. Thus, Democracy is born, corporation rules, and the people died: at least on paper. We no longer are electors, we are voters; we no longer have statesmen, we have candidates. There is a reason for the change in language, it is a different spell. When were birth certificates created, in the republic or the democracy? How did God feel about census, counting HIS people? You can count your people, you cannot count HIS people. So congratulations, if you support the democracy, you reject God, you are rebellious, a debtor and if you support the Republican form of Government, and this was guaranteed in Article 4 § 4, you are an enemy to the Democracy. Gold and Silver must be use to pay debts in the Republican form of Government, however, no so in the democracy.

Have you ever complained that the national debt is too big? Stop your whining! The debt shall not be questioned. If you cannot see congress balancing the budget, read it, they do not have to. They are not responsible for repayment of the debts. These same debts are held illegal and void. People are responsible for the repayment of the debts and, without gold or silver. Here is the tricky part: how can a public servant demand masters be responsible of the debts the public servants create? Answer: They cannot. They just say: “Neither, Mr. Doe or I are responsible”, “neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation” and to appease the “we, the people”, all such debts, obligations, and claims shall be held illegal and void. How are we, the people, to repay the debt or obligations of the UNITED STATES? What are “obligations”? They are held to be illegal and void, until we accept them for value.