AS OLD AS TIME

We now know that there are laws that allow us to do this “Accepted For Value” or “Accept for Value”, as wealth, mammon, is made up, which means poverty is a lie. Is there a biblical reference to this Acceptance and discharge? It is all over the bible, as for Christians, it is the foundation of its existence, and the crucifixion: “Luke 23:32 And two others, evil-doers, were taken with him to be put to death. 33 And when they came to the place which is named Golgotha, they put him on the cross, and the evil-doers, one on the right side, and the other on the left. Luke 23:39-43 And one of the evil-doers on the cross, with bitter feeling, said to him, Are you not the Christ? Get yourself and us out of this. But the other, protesting, said, Have you no fear of God? for you have a part in the same punishment, And with reason; for we have the right reward of our acts, but this man has done nothing wrong. And he said, Jesus, keep me in mind when you come in your kingdom. And he said to him, Truly I say to you, Today you will be with me in Paradise.” Was this man baptized? No indication that he was. Also note they specially mention the left and right. Where in our glorious accounting system do we put debts? Debts go on the left side and the credits go on the right. In the middle is the cross of accounting, or zero point. What did this man do? He “accepted for value” his punishment and he was granted paradise. His debts / sins were forgiven. Ever since the garden, be it fantasy, fiction or reality, it tells of the value of not accepting your debts (actions). “Genesis 2: 9-14 And the voice of the Lord God came to the man, saying, Where are you? And he said, Hearing your voice in the garden I was full of fear, because I was without clothing: and I kept myself from your eyes. And he said, Who gave you the knowledge that you were without clothing? Have you taken of the fruit of the tree which I said you were not to take? And the man said, The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me the fruit of the tree and I took it. And the Lord God said to the woman, What have you done? And the woman said, I was tricked by the deceit of the snake and I took it. And the Lord God said to the snake, Because you have done this you are cursed more than all cattle and every beast of the field; you will go flat on the earth, and dust will be your food all the days of your life” Did these two accept their actions? No. They decided to hide. One cannot be forgiven, if one does not admit or accept. As if God did not know what happen? Did God argue? Debate? Discuss? Challenge? On the other hand, did God accept their answers and punish whom they blamed? God in fact did unto Adam and Eve as he would have wanted done to him, and that is accept the words as spoken, even if it were a lie. The snake was never asked why he did it, never given the opportunity to blame anyone or make up a story, never had the opportunity to seek forgiveness. What would have happen had Adam said, “It is my fault for my/our actions, please forgive me”? Nevertheless, we spend our life judging and blaming others for our actions. The fruit of Tree of Knowledge of Good and evil is all about judgment. The fruit is symbolic for you reap what you sow. The fruit of the actions, results. Knowledge is experience. Good and evil is judgment. This earthly reality, is the result of experiencing judgment; paradise lost, it is hell.

When God killed King David’s son it was due to David’s own decree. He had committed adultery and murder to get Bath-Sheba. David accepted for value his sins. Christ is often referred to, as the son of David, for a son will be the price for the sins of others. In addition, if we go further into the bible, does it not say “Agree with thine adversary quickly Matthew 5:25”, “Matthew 5:40 and if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloche also”. Know that when you disagree with another, you call him a liar or at least dishonor, this is why it is important to countersue, rather then being a defendant, for a defendant position is to claim the other has lied and if you cannot prove it, you become the liar, you would be in dishonor. If I say this is black and another says this is white, one is lying. They may in fact view it differently then I, but this is not the claim: I see this as being white. Whom am I to say what he understands is incorrect. Stop pointing fingers and accept for value the way they see it. It does not mean it is true, it only means this is what they believe. Does government lie? It is a fiction, what else can fictions do but create fictions. A fiction is a lie. There are also other principals as well, “do unto others as you have them do unto you, judge not least you be judged, turn the other cheek, forgive and ye will be forgiven”. Do these conflict with the idea of accept for value? Are they not in line with “Accepted For Value” or “Accept for Value”? Love your neighbor as thyself, Love God with all your heart, mind, body and sprit: how can you love, if you are calling them a liar, or fighting with them.